Loading

The Great Barrier Reef Expedition 1928-1929 Birth of modern coral reef science

One hundred years ago, in early 1922, the Royal Geographical Society was approached by Sir Matthew Nathan, Governor of Queensland, and President of the Queensland branch of the Royal Geographical Society of Australia, seeking support for a research expedition to the Great Barrier Reef (GBR).

This request came at a time of rapid political, economic and social transition in the UK following the Great War and at a time when British society was still reluctant to offer economic and social equality to women.

Six years later, a major expedition to the GBR, led by British scientists, was to take place with six of the 16 British participants being women.

The GBR Expedition was ground-breaking in many respects, particularly in the interdisciplinary nature of the science, the scope of scientific observations and measurements and the establishment of exceptional ecological and geomorphological benchmarks. It can reasonably be claimed to mark the birth of modern coral reef science.

Leaving for Low Isles: the advance party on R.M.S. Ormonde, Tilbury Docks, London, 26 May 1928. (source: James Cook University Library Special Collections, Sir Charles Maurice Yonge Collection, Great Barrier Reef Expedition Photo Album 1. Creators: Frederick Stratten Russell and Gweneth Kate Moy Russell (1928). Reproduced with kind permission of the James Cook University Library, Australia).
"Almost every aspect of the landscape was full of colour and brilliance, and we were in a world utterly unlike anything familiar to us. The sense of unreality was extraordinary"

TA Stephenson, Yonge Reef, Outer Barrier (Reproduced with kind permission of the family of Anne Stephenson)

The Expedition’s ‘home’ was on the reef platform’s tiny sand cay, only 0.03 square kilometeres in size. By being based at a single location, Low Isles, for 13 months, ‘the work of the Great Barrier Reef Expedition of 1928-29 emphasized for the first time the relationships between reef growth and environment and the critical importance for their study in the field.’ [2]

The sand cay at Low Isles (1929), looking SW towards the Queensland mainland from Tripneustes Spit. © Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).

Low Isles, on the inner shelf, northern Great Barrier Reef, is the Barrier’s southernmost ‘low wooded island’. This island type has three components: arcuate shingle ramparts on the windward rim (to right below); a mangrove swamp immediately in the lee of the ramparts; and a leeward sand cay. The mangrove forest has expanded, now (2012) covering 25% of the reef platform, up from < 10% in 1928-1929. [3]

Aerial photograph of Low Isles taken at an oblique angle from the south east on 5 October 2007. Woody Island, the mangrove stand on the exposed side of the reef, can be seen in the foreground, while the smaller, vegetated sand cay where the Expedition was based can be seen in the background (reproduced under licence #2011071. Photo credit: David Wall © davidwallphoto.com).

The Anglo-Australian scientific party at Low Isles, 3 November 1928, in front of one of the specially constructed huts. Seated in the centre of the front row is Henry Caselli Richards, Professor of Geology at the University of Queensland, founding President of the Great Barrier Reef Committee (inaugurated Brisbane, 12 September 1922) and a key driver behind the Expedition.

Party at Low Isles, 3 November 1928. From left to right, back row, standing: H.C. Vigden, F.A. McNeill, J.A. Steers (largely obscured), A.P. Orr, H.S. Mort, H.A. Longman, E.O. Marks, M.A. Spender, J.S. Colman, G. Tandy, C.E. Marchant, A.A. Livingstone, T. Iredale; front row, seated: F.W. Moorhouse, A.C. Wishart, Miss S.M. Marshall, F.S. Russell, Mrs Russell, Professor H.C. Richards, Mrs Yonge, C.M. Yonge, Mrs Stephenson, T.A. Stephenson, A.G. Nicholls; seated on ground: Master Iredale, G.W. Otter (photo credit: M.J. Yonge) © Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).

The Expedition had been formally endorsed by the British Association in Leeds on 2 September 1927 and widely publicised in the regional and national press. Much was made of the participation of Mattie Yonge, the wife of the Expedition Leader, Maurice Yonge. Press coverage tended to underplay the fact that she was a fully qualified doctor. Writing from Low Isles on 17 September 1928, with ‘tailors and dressmakers forgotten’, Mattie noted the female dress code was now one of ‘khaki shorts with a blouse or jumper – much more comfortable than skirts’. [4]

Top (from left): Francis Potts, Sir Matthew Nathan, Maurice Yonge, Mattie Yonge, Sir T.W. Edgeworth David. (Yorkshire Post, 3 September 1927 (and bottom right). Bottom left: Sunday Chronicle, 4 September 1927; Bottom right: Daily Chronicle, 14 September 1927 [4] Papers of Sir Maurice Yonge, Subseries C561-562, press cuttings, nla.obj-1127491484

Once in Australia, press coverage commented upon the presence of four women in the advance scientific party; two further female participants joined in 1929, including the highly talented Sidnie Manton.

Four women in Expedition to Great Barrier Reef (from left: Anne Stephenson, (top) Gwen Russell, (bottom) Sheina Marshall, Mattie Yonge). News, Adelaide 4 July 1928

The participation of the female scientists served as a catalyst for the greater involvement of women in Australian science. Furthermore, members of the local indigenous community were not just in support staff roles but also contributed to field data collection.

Left: C.M.Yonge, 1928, Harry Mossman and Paul Sexton working a winch, National Library of Australia, nla.obj-14508939. Right: C.M.Yonge, 1928, A scientist inspects the sunshine recorder and anemometer, Low Islands, Queensland, National Library of Australia, nla.obj-145087441. Here reproduced from Plate V, Yonge (1930).

Research was highly interdisciplinary, including meticulous microscopic work and painstaking laboratory observation; in situ monitoring and experimentation (e.g. coral transplant experiments); cataloguing linkages between reef habitats, tidal processes and physical and chemical properties of water; and quantitative inventories of reef-flat and reef-front biota.

Top: Surveying in the ‘flattie’ (photo credit: S. Manton, with kind permission from the family’s archives). Middle: Translocated coral colonies on cement blocks used for measurements of skeletal growth between September 1928- May 1929 by Alan Stephenson (Maurice Yonge Collection, the Natural History Museum, London. © The Natural History Museum, London). Bottom: Maurice Yonge at his bench in the laboratory (photo credit: Sheina Marshall archive, Scottish Association for Marine Science).
© Royal Geographical Society (with IBG)

What role do the symbiotic algae, living in corals, play in coral nutrition? This research involved both laboratory and field experiments, with the use of a ‘coffin-like’ structure on the reef which excluded light and into which corals were placed for a given period before examination. Above, the Expedition Leader, Maurice Yonge, (right) and his Australian Assistant, Aubrey Nicholls, demonstrate the experimental setup. Natural bleaching events (where symbiotic algae are lost from the coral) also provided insight into interactions between coral and their algae.

Sea temperature record from the Anchorage during 1928-29 as reported in Orr AP & Moorhouse FW 1933b The temperature of the waters in the Anchorage, Low Isles Scientific Reports, GBR Expedition, Vol. II (4) : 98-101

Expedition scientists measured the seawater temperature at 1m depth twice daily in The Anchorage throughout their stay on Low Isles (9.00h black line 17.30h red line).

In February 1929, when seawater temperatures were at their maximum, scientists noticed ‘whitened’ or bleached corals on the shallow reef flat. While some colonies survived, many died. Their observations of temperature-induced bleaching, the subsequent monitoring of time taken for corals to recover and microscopic studies on possible bleaching mechanisms were new and innovative.

Temperature induced coral bleaching on a shallow reef flat. Photo credit: Niphon Phongsuwan

Coral reproduction was also studied using the branching coral Pocillopora which broods its young (planulae) and planulates monthly on a lunar cycle. Planulae measure ~1mm long on release.

Ingenious devices described as ‘clocktowers’ were placed on the reef into which settled planulae were placed on petri dishes and the growth and development of the coral colony observed over time.

Left: Released planulae. Middle: Settled coral 46 days old. Right: Coral 186 days. Photo Credit: Jamie Craggs

Meticulous repeated measurements of growth of coral colonies were made using specially devised photographic equipment (shown below, with Alan Stephenson), providing some of the most detailed observations of growth rates and additions of coral sub-units (polyps) ever recorded over time.

Alan Stephenson and apparatus for photographing coral colonies (C.M. Yonge, 1928, Thomas Stephenson with apparatus for photographing corals, Low Islands, Queensland, National Library of Australia, nla.obj-145095643).
Stephenson TA 1931 Development and the formation of colonies in Pocillopora and Porites – Part 1. Scientific Reports, GBR Expedition, Vol. III (3): 133-134, Plate VI, Pocillopora bulbosa (now named Pocillopora damicornis).
Drawing up from field mapping (from left to right: Michael Spender, Alan Stephenson, Anne Stephenson) (photo credit: S. Manton, with kind permission of her family’s archives). This image relates to the Expedition’s excursion to Lizard Island and the reefs of the neighbouring outer barrier, 31 May to 13 June 1929.

Careful field mapping (shown above by Michael Spender, with Anne Stephenson, at Lizard island) was a hallmark of the Expedition.

At Low isles, there was the major innovation of checking ground observations against aerial photography, flown on 24 September 1928 by the Royal Australian Air Force.

Top: Expedition members and support staff meet the aircrew and inspect the aircraft at The Anchorage, Low Isles during the aerial survey of 24 September 1928 (source: James Cook University Library Special Collections, Sir Charles Maurice Yonge Collection, Great Barrier Reef Expedition Photo Album 2, Creators: Frederick Stratten Russell and Gweneth Kate Moy Russell (1928). Reproduced with kind permission of the James Cook University Library, Australia). Bottom: Sand cay at Low Isles from RAAF survey, 24 September 1928 (with kind permission from Maurice Yonge Collection, the Natural History Museum, London. © The Natural History Museum, London).
‘Spender is making a beautiful job of the map and when it is finished you will have the finest survey of this type of island ever accomplished.’ [6] [7]
© Royal Geographical Society (with IBG)
Further aerial photography was flown in January 1945, followed by a brief field visit, enabling Fairbridge and Teichert to add the impact of the 1931 and 1934 cyclones to Spender’s map [7].

In a further innovation, a diving hood, into which air was pumped from a boat, was used for underwater observations. However, as sketched by Sidnie Manton, the intended usage (top left) was not always matched by the reality of underwater mapping and sampling (bottom left).

Left: Sketch in letter from Sidnie Manton to family from ‘Low Island’, 24 May 1929 (with kind permission from the family’s archive). Published in: Clifford, E. & Clifford, J. 2020. Sidnie Manton Letters and Diaries Expedition to the Great Barrier Reef 1928-1929. Private publication; Amazon Press. Right: Expedition member A.P. Orr modelling the dive helmet from which the first underwater surveys of the reef were made during the Expedition. The helmet was made in the Plymouth Marine Laboratory, based on the designs of an earlier one used by A.G. Mayor in Samoa (with kind permission from the Tandy archive, the Natural History Museum, London. © The Natural History Museum, London.

Bathymetry, number of species of algae and corals and total number of coral colonies along a reef flat to reef margin traverse were all precisely tied to established tidal levels [8]. The value of these accurate measurements as a benchmark against which both ecological and geomorphological changes can be ascertained is now becoming clear.

Left: Map of the area of maximum coral growth on the seaward slope. Rock substrate, in grey, with individual coral colonies (key to species alongside) and sandy floor in black [8]. Right: abundance of coral growth with depth, seaward of boulder-zone [6].

One legacy of the 1928-29 GBR Expedition was a follow-up expedition in 1973 to the northern Great Barrier Reef led by Dr David Stoddart

Alfred Steers (far left; Head of Geographical Section, 1928-29), Richard Orme (second left; Deputy Leader, 1973), David Stoddart (back to camera, Expedition Leader, 1973) discussing shingle rampart features at Low Isles, on a field excursion, 2nd International Coral Reef Symposium, 22 June to 2 July 1973 Legacy of 1928-1929. Photo credit: David Hopley, with kind permission of the originator.
From poster, by kind permission of S.M. Hamylton.

A 90 year evaluation of reef top changes [3], including new mapping by drone, has revealed expansion of mangrove forests (below map) and rampart migration (below graph).

[3] Hamylton SM, McLean R, Lowe M, Adnan FAF 2019 Ninety years of change on a low wooded island, Great Barrier Reef. Royal Society Open Science 6: doi: 10.1098/rsos.181314.
[3] Hamylton SM, McLean R, Lowe M, Adnan FAF 2019 90 years of change on a low wooded island, Great Barrier Reef. Royal Society Open Science 6: doi: 10.1098/rsos.181314.

Comparisons against the ecological surveys reveal a long-term decline in coral and invertebrate richness at Low Isles in the fifty years since 1928–29. This is likely due to repeated cyclone damage and coral bleaching, on top of increased influence from regional mainland agricultural activity.

"When we there in 28/29 the reef flat when exposed at low tide was literally an aquarium. But I really saw it properly again in 1978 (50 years on) when I was working at AIMS south of Townsville. All that exposed reef was covered with sediments with only holothurians in their element and flourishing. The sediment had come from the mouth of the Daintree River some 10 miles away. This is the result of replacing the rain forest by sugar cane fields" [9]. Observations by the Leader of the 1928-29 Expedition, Maurice Yonge.
‘Aquarium’ nature of the reefs in 1928-1929, as illustrated in TA Stephenson’s contemporary oil painting [1]. (Reproduced with kind permission of the family of Anne Stephenson).
In The Anchorage, hard coral cover has been replaced by abundant soft corals. Photo credit: Maoz Fine.
"… this Expedition set new standards and defined new goals in reef studies. This was true not only of C.M. Yonge’s work on coral physiology, but of Stephenson’s ecological and Steers’ geomorphological studies too. This co-operative work represented the first major advance on the predominately theoretical and deductive mode of work which had long dominated discussions of the ‘coral reef problem’." [10]
Getting ready to leave: the end of the Expedition in July 1929. © Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).

Acknowledgements:

Prepared by: Tom Spencer (1), Barbara E. Brown (2,3), Sarah M. Hamylton (4), Roger F. McLean (5)

  1. Cambridge Coastal Research Unit, Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN UK
  2. School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
  3. Environmental Research Unit, University of the Highlands and Islands, Castle Street, Thurso, Caithness KW14 7JD, Scotland, UK
  4. School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences, University of Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
  5. School of Science, University of New South Wales - Canberra at ADFA, Canberra BC ACT 2610, Australia

Online exhibition by: Francesca Nugent

References:

[1] Stephenson TA 1946 Coral reefs. Endeavour 5: 96–106.

[2] Stoddart DR 1969 Ecology and morphology of recent coral reefs. Biological Reviews 44: 433-498.

[3] Hamylton SM, McLean R, Lowe M, Adnan FAF 2019 Ninety years of change on a low wooded island, Great Barrier Reef. Royal Society Open Science 6: doi: 10.1098/rsos.181314.

[4] Papers of Sir Maurice Yonge, Subseries C561-562, press cuttings, nla.obj-1127491484

[5] Yonge to Steers, 4 April 1929; Royal Geographical Society CB9 1921-1930, Great Barrier Reef Expedition, Box 1. By kind permission of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).

[6] Map from Spender M 1930 Island-reefs of the Queensland Coast. The Geographical Journal 76: 193-214, 273-293. This map served as a template not only for the expeditioners’ field sites and reports but also for later publications.

[6] Reproduced from Spender, M. 1930. Island-reefs of the Queensland Coast. The Geographical Journal 76: 193-214, 273-293 (Figure 4), by kind permission of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG)).

[7] Fairbridge RW & Teichert C 1948 The Low Isles of the Great Barrier Reef: A new analysis. The Geographical Journal 111: 67-88 (facing p. 74), by kind permission of the Royal Geographical Society (with IBG).

[8] Re-drawn from Manton & Stephenson (1935). Manton SM & Stephenson TA 1935 Ecological surveys of coral reefs. Great Barrier Reef Expedition 1928-29 Scientific Reports 3: 273-312.

[9] CM Yonge to BE Brown, 14 September 1983; E75, correspondence files, Maurice Yonge Collection, Natural History Museum UK, with kind permission. © The Natural History Museum, London).

[10] Stoddart DR 1972.Opening remarks to scientific sessions. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Corals and Coral Reefs, Mandapam Camp, India, 12–16 January 1969. Mandapam Camp: Marine Biological Association of India, 17-19.