Loading

Tactical Urbanism A Participatory Planning & Action Toolkit for Environmental Justice Communities

Purpose

Tactical urbanism is a citizen-led approach to community development using short-term, low-cost, and scalable demonstration projects to promote long-term change on community-identified concerns.

This toolkit is designed for community advocates, artists, activists, planners, civic leaders, citizens, and anyone interested in facilitating tactical urbanism with, by, and for environmental justice communities. In the first section of this toolkit, we will review definitions and concepts related to tactical urbanism and environmental justice. Then we will discuss the principles underlying an environmental justice approach to tactical urbanism. Next, we will provide an overview of community engagement strategies, including Citizen Science and Community-Based Participatory Research. Then we will dive into tactical urbanism strategies and discuss how to achieve environmental justice and equity through tactical urbanism. Finally, we will provide an appendix of relevant books, videos, websites, user-friendly tools, social media platforms, and community-based organizations. This is a "living toolkit" and readers are encouraged to submit comments, suggestions, and additional resources via our contact information.

"[Tactical urbanism] is... a process that seeks to upend a public planning process that comes from the 1950s and earlier — one that’s not flexible or transparent, that’s not meant to actually engage anybody at all, even if it requires a ton of 'community engagement' sessions. And we think that tactical urbanism is a methodology that actually addresses problems that disproportionately impact communities of color." - Tony Garcia

Definitions

Tactical Urbanism

There are multiple definitions for tactical urbanism, though the common thread is that interventions are often citizen-led, short-term, low-cost, and scalable, leading to long-term change.

  • Rebar, 2011: "Rebar defi nes tactical urbanism as the use of modest or temporary revisions to urban space to seed structural environmental change. Our use of tactics is based on a belief that deep organizing structures (social, cultural, economic and otherwise) have a two-way relationship with the physical environment: they both produce the environment and are re-produced by it."
  • Lydon et al., 2012: "Improving the liveability of our towns and cities commonly starts at the street, block or building scale. While larger scale efforts do have their place, incremental, small-scale improvements are increasingly seen as a way to stage more substantial investments…. Sometimes sanctioned, sometimes not, these actions are commonly referred to as “guerrilla urbanism”, “pop-up urbanism”, “city repair” or “DIY urbanism”. For the moment, we like “Tactical Urbanism”.
  • Lydon & Garcia, 2015: “Tactical Urbanism is an approach to neighbourhood building and activation using short-term, low-cost, and scalable interventions and policies. It makes use of an iterative development process, the efficient use of resources, and the creative potential unleashed by social interaction…. In many ways, Tactical Urbanism is a learned response to the slow and siloed conventional city building process”
  • Dean, 2018: Tactical urbanism can be understood as the active use of public space by citizens to create new and diverse public discourses around urban change. This is, often, achieved through art, performance and creative re-use of materials in the urban realm. Hence, an understanding of Tactical Urbanism may be that it challenges, contests, or negotiates with urban development and change. The purpose of this is effecting more inclusive urban developments that can narrow the divide between winners and losers.... tactical urbanism engages citizens in forms of social action and mild forms of civil disobedience to creatively test out alternative ways of using public space to improve neighbourhoods."

Mike Lydon et al. (2012) define tactical urbanism as an intervention with the following five characteristics:

  1. A deliberate, phased approach to instigating change;
  2. The offering of local solutions for local planning challenges;
  3. Short-term commitment and realistic expectations;
  4. Low-risks, with possibly high reward; and
  5. The development of social capital between citizens and the building of organizational capacity between public-private institutions, non-profits, and the constituents.

Environmental Justice

Vulnerability, as described by Mechanic and Tanner (2007), is susceptibility to harm and it results from a complex interaction between the an individual's, population's, or community's available resources and present challenges and may therefore require the application of different policies or interventions.

Vulnerable individuals: "...those who, because of their race, class, gender or sexual identity, religion, or other intersectional characteristics or circumstances, are more susceptible to... emotional, financial, or physical harm or neglect." (McDonald and Forte, 2022)

Vulnerable populations: "Vulnerable populations, based on their social and economic standing, have the fewest resources to prepare for a hazard, they tend to live in the highest risk locations, and they lack the social, political and economic capital necessary to take advantage of resources to adapt or recover from changes." (USACE 2016)

Vulnerable communities (climate change): "Vulnerable communities are those whose location puts them at special risk from the effects of climate change. These include settlements along coastlines and inland waterways that are at risk from flooding and sea-level rise, as well as communities at risk from increased drought, higher temperatures, and wildfires. Further, special attention needs to be paid to underserved and low-income communities that have fewer resources and face other barriers to accessing resilience and adaptation solutions. These communities typically lack the community and economic amenities that are promoted in smart growth strategies, and many already suffer adverse health impacts from proximity to industry and degraded environments." (American Society of Landscape Architects, 2022)

Impacted residents: those who have experienced a particular harm.

The White House Environmental Justice Advisory Council provided the following definitions as part of their Final Recommendations for Justice40 and Executive Order 12898 revisions:

  • Community of color: "a geographically distinct area in which the population of any of the following categories of individuals, individually or in combination, is higher than the average population of that category for the State in which the community is located: (i) Black; (ii) African American; (iii) Asian; (iv) Pacific Islander; (v) Other Non-White race; (vi) Hispanic; (vii) Latino; (viii) Indigenous or members of a Tribe; and (ix) Linguistically isolated."
  • Environmental justice: "the just treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income, or ability, with respect to the development, implementation, enforcement, and evaluation of laws, regulations, programs, policies, practices, and activities, that affect human health and the environment."
  • Environmental justice community: "a geographic location with significant representation of persons of color, low-income persons, indigenous persons, or members of Tribal nations, where such persons experience, or are at risk of experiencing, higher or more adverse human health or environmental outcomes."
  • Low-income community: "any census block group in which 30 percent or more of the population are individuals with an annual household income equal to, or less than, the greater of: (i) an amount equal to 80 percent of the median income of the area in which the household is located, as reported by the Department of Housing and Urban Development; or (ii) 200 percent of the Federal poverty line."
  • Meaningful participation: "potentially affected populations have an opportunity to participate in decisions that will affect their health or environment, that the population’s contributions can influence the agency’s decisions, that the viewpoints of all participants involved will be considered in the decision-making process, and that the agency will seek out and facilitate the involvement of the population potentially affected, including consultation with Tribal and indigenous communities and by providing culturally appropriate information, access for people with disabilities, and language access for persons with Limited English Proficiency (LEP), considering issue of access raised by location, transportation, and other factors affecting participation, and by making available technical assistance to build community-based capacity for participating."

Principles

In order for tactical urbanism strategies to address spatial inequalities in communities, they must be rooted in environmental justice principles.

Environmental Justice Principles

Robert Bullard, known as the "father of environmental justice," described the movement as "trying to address all of the inequities that result from human settlement, industrial facility siting and industrial development."

Delegates to the First National People of Color Environmental Leadership Summit held on October 24-27, 1991, in Washington DC, drafted and adopted 17 principles of Environmental Justice. The California Environmental Justice Alliance summarized the following environmental justice principles for policy implementation:

  • Prioritize and value prevention, human health, and improving quality of life.
  • Prioritize [vulnerable] communities
  • Meaningful community engagement
  • Responsiveness
  • Transparency
  • Accountability
  • Proactive partnerships

In December 1996, the “Working Group Meeting on Globalization and Trade" was hosted by the Southwest Network for Environmental and Economic Justice in Jemez, New Mexico and adopted the following “Jemez Principles” for democratic organizing:

  1. Be Inclusive
  2. Emphasis on Bottom-Up Organizing
  3. Let People Speak for Themselves
  4. Work Together In Solidarity and Mutuality
  5. Build Just Relationships Among Ourselves
  6. Commitment to Self-Transformation

Community Engagement Principles

The Principles of Community Engagement (Second Edition) offers the following principles for community engagement:

  1. Be clear about the purposes or goals of the engagement effort and the populations and/or communities you want to engage.
  2. Become knowledgeable about the community’s culture, economic conditions, social networks, political and power structures, norms and values, demographic trends, history, and experience with efforts by outside groups to engage it in various programs. Learn about the community’s perceptions of those initiating the engagement activities.
  3. Go to the community, establish relationships, build trust, work with the formal and informal leadership, and seek commitment from community organizations and leaders to create processes for mobilizing the community.
  4. Remember and accept that collective self-determination is the responsibility and right of all people in a community. No external entity should assume it can bestow on a community the power to act in its own self-interest.
  5. Partnering with the community is necessary to create change and improve health [and environment].
  6. All aspects of community engagement must recognize and respect the diversity of the community. Awareness of the various cultures of a community and other factors affecting diversity must be paramount in planning, designing, and implementing approaches to engaging a community.
  7. Community engagement can only be sustained by identifying and mobilizing community assets and strengths and by developing the community’s capacity and resources to make decisions and take action.
  8. Organizations that wish to engage a community as well as individuals seeking to effect change must be prepared to release control of actions or interventions to the community and be flexible enough to meet its changing needs.
  9. Community collaboration requires long-term commitment by the engaging organization and its partners.

Community Engagement

Community Engagement is…the process of working collaboratively with and through groups of people affiliated by geographic proximity, special interest, or similar situations to address issues affecting the well-being of those people It is a powerful vehicle for bringing about environmental and behavioral changes that will improve the health of the community and its members It often involves partnerships and coalitions that help mobilize resources and influence systems, change relationships among partners, and serve as catalysts for changing policies, programs, and practices (CDC, 1997).
The goals of community engagement in the context of environmental justice are to build trust, form partnerships, improve communication, and empower communities for self-determination.

Sherry Arnstein's Ladder of Citizen Participation describes the various levels of citizen agency, control, and power related to public decision making:

Community Engagement Strategies

Build Partnerships

According to Davies (2000), the three principles to building partnerships are:

  1. Successful partnerships are based on reciprocity. All those involved in the partnership have overlapping responsibilities and each needs the help of the others.
  2. Developing effective partnerships is a democratic process. Partnerships should recognize the different interests, races, religions, and educational status of its participants, and should be prepared to resolve conflicts through the democratic processes of mediation, negotiation, and compromise.
  3. Effective partnerships provide a variety of opportunities to participate in decision making.

Build Trust

Accoring to Ricklefs (2022), the three ways to build trust in community engagement and tactical urbanism efforts are:

  1. Communicate clearly and transparently. Make sure your project offers answers to the following questions:
  • What is the goal of this project?
  • Who is it aimed at?
  • How will input be used?
  • Which selection criteria will be used?
  • How will the ideas be implemented?

2. Showcase the direct results of earlier community engagement and tactical urbanism projects.

3. Take privacy seriously and explain clearly why you’re asking for specific data from community members, and what you intend to do with that information.

Tools & Strategies

A number of tools and strategies can be used to support community engagement around tactical urbanism and environmental justice issues. Here are a few examples (click on the links for "how to" guides):

  • Surveys: collect data on demographics, knowledge, attitudes, behaviors and open-ended feedback with written or online surveys.
  • Vulnerability assessment: used to ascertain the susceptibility of a natural or human system to sustaining damage (or benefiting) from climate change.
  • Interviews: collect in-depth information with key informant interviews.
  • Public forum: a public forum or hearing may be a formal meeting for receiving testimony from the public at large on a local issue, or proposed government action.
  • Panel discussions: a live or virtual discussion about a specific topic amongst a selected group of panelists who share differing perspectives in front of a larger audience.
  • Roundtable discussions: A roundtable discussion is a conversation on a single topic held between a relatively small group of perhaps 8 to 10 people.
  • PhotoVoice: Photovoice is a process in which people – usually those with limited power due to poverty, language barriers, race, class, ethnicity, gender, culture, or other circumstances – use video and/or photo images to capture aspects of their environment and experiences and share them with others.
  • Community taskforces: once a need or problem is identified, a community taskforce or action committee can be formed comprised of community members and agencies that work toward resolving the problem.
  • Good neighbor agreement: a non-binding agreement between a community and an industry that works to address specific issues of concern in a collaborative way.
  • Digital engagement tools: digital and online engagement tools can include interactive maps, project landing pages, idea walls, surveys, forums & more.
  • Plan Integration for Resilience Scorecard: provides a mechanism to discuss prioritization of community investment with leadership, stakeholders, and the ‘whole community’.

Equitable Community Engagement

According to the Equitable Community Engagement Blueprint (City of Durham, 2018), "Community engagement alone is not enough. It needs to be equitable. For engagement to be equitable, it must aim for participation from a group representative of a community’s geography, race/ethnicity, age, gender, and other demographic characteristics. It must place specific emphasis on those who will be most adversely impacted by the project and those who are most often marginalized in these conversations." The Blueprint offers the following key components for equitable community engagement:

  • Shift the engagement paradigm: For engagement to be equitable, the paradigm must shift to measure who participated, in addition to how many people. The onus is on the City to invest the resources to ensure underrepresented demographics have a voice in the process. It is not enough to say someone is not in the room, the City must ask why.
  • Collect baseline data: Developing a baseline of who is currently participating in government processes is critical towards creating equitable engagement plans. Data will allow the City to know who is underrepresented in engagement to create intentional strategies to reach them.
  • Center race in any equitable engagement: Intentional efforts centered on race are critical to repairing the trust necessary for true authentic engagement.
  • Measure demographics: age, gender, disability, sexual orientation, renter/owner, income, educational level, and language.
  • Go to community: To reach community members that are less likely to participate in government processes because of structural barriers, the City needs to go to the community. If the City expects community to always come to them, the people with the least amount of barriers will continue to participate. Going to the community can include a variety of engagement activities, such as door knocking, events in the neighborhood or at heavily trafficked businesses, meetings/events hosted in partnership with local religious organizations or neighborhood groups.
  • Respect history: Understand previous government impacts.
  • Be flexible: There will be shifts to the process. Different methods will be tried until the people who will be most adversely impacted and underrepresented are at the table. This is key to transparency principles and important for long-term trust.
  • Establish accountability groups: consisting of underrepresented groups.

Citizen Science

Citizen Science is the practice of public participation and collaboration in scientific research to increase scientific knowledge.

Citizen Science Strategies:

Citizen science can inform the identification, justification, design, and evaluation of tactical urbanism interventions. The following are steps for conducing a successful citizen science campaign (click the links for additional details):

  1. Scope Your Problem: know your tools, engage your stakeholders and participants, know where your project fits, and get approval.
  2. Design a Project: know your objectives, determine your resources, plan project management, and finalize logistics.
  3. Build a Community: know your community partners, engage your community, acknowledge achievements, and consider socio-cultural issues.
  4. Manage Your Data: acquire, process, analyze, share, and preserve data.
  5. Sustain and Improve: communicate effectively and evaluate the process and outcomes.

Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR)

CBPR is a partnership approach to research that equitably involves community members, practitioners, and academic researchers in all aspects of the process, enabling all partners to contribute their expertise and share responsibility and ownership.8 Its purpose is to enhance understanding of a given phenomenon and to integrate knowledge gained with actions to improve health in the communities involved. (ISRAEL Et al., 2010)

Community-Based Participatory Research

Community-Based Participatory Research can be implemented to inform and evaluate tactical urbanism interventions. According to Israel et al. (2010), the core principles of CBPR are:

  1. a commitment to build on community strengths and resources;
  2. to foster co-learning and capacity building; and
  3. to balance research and action for mutual benefit of all partners.

Community involvement in research exists along a spectrum between investigator-driven (community has low power, control, responsibility, ownership, participation, influence and trust) to community-driven (high involvement):

The steps to conducting CBPR are as follows:

  1. Form a CBPR partnership;
  2. Assess community strengths and dynamics;
  3. Identify priority issues and research questions;
  4. Design and conduct etiologic, intervention, and/or policy research.
  5. Provide feedback and interpret research findings; and
  6. Disseminate and translate research findings.

With its emphasis on power sharing and action as well as research, CBPR is an especially viable approach for addressing the understandable distrust of academic research that exists within communities of color.

Tactical Urbanism

Tactical Urbanism is a citizen-led approach to community development using short-term, low-cost, and scalable demonstration projects to promote long-term change on issues such as street safety, greenspace accessibility, stormwater retention, urban heat island mitigation, and other community-identified concerns.

Tactical Urbanism Overview

Tactical urbanism projects can range from temporary demonstrations to semi-permanent interventions.

The following chart demonstrates the iterative approach to tactical urbanism project delivery.

Some tactical urbanism projects that start as unsanctioned can become sanctioned over time.

Tactical Urbanism Processes and Considerations

A framework of design thinking can be used to approach tactical urbanism interventions.

In Diffusion of Innovations (Rogers, 1962), five factors are identified that influence whether humans adopt or reject innovation.

  1. Relative advantage: Will the project actually provide an advantage over the status quo for an identified group of people?
  2. Compatibility: Is the project compatible with its social and physical context, in both scale and scope?
  3. Simplicity: Can the project be easily understood by a wide segment of the population?
  4. Trailabilty: Can the project be tested easily? Can it be easily replicated elsewhere? Is the path to adoption clear and relatively hurdle free?
  5. Observability: Is the project going to be visible to many others? Will it attract use and attention?

In The Lean Startup (Reis, 2011), the process used to test a project is "build-measure-learn": build the project prototype, measure its impact, and learn from the results.

Small scale spatial interventions that bring vibrancy to city life have been a preoccupation of designers in recent years. While creative actions have focused on the almost-healthy environment, what of those communities perennially underserved, and whose problems of poverty, crime, health and environmental decay are more complex and challenging? (Harrison, 2018)

Environmental Justice and Equity through Tactical Urbanism

A combination of shifting demographics, public frustration, economic uncertainties, and radical new forms of communication and connectivity have increased the use of tactical urbanism interventions to achieve justice and equity.

Where official planning processes elude social and environmental justice, tactical urbanism has the opportunity to empower and activate traditionally excluded social groups, including communities of color. According to Dean (2018), in order to promote environmental justice and equity through tactical urbanism, practitioners should be equipped with:

  1. a set of approaches that recognize the social [and environmental justice] aims of tactical urbanism and understand them as an informative response to the techno-centrism of policy;
  2. tools that allow practitioners to build upon the cultural and political values of urban communities in their projects; and
  3. practices that embed collaboration in the very design of urban projects or re-development decision-making.

Tactical Urbanism for Greenspace Equity

Formerly redlined low-income communities of color have less access to parks and greenspace, less tree canopy, worse stormwater draining and floodplain management, and higher temperatures due to urban heat island effect. Tactical urbanism strategies are particularly well suited to address these and other issues related to equitable natural resource management.

ULI Boston/New England convened a Living With Heat (LWH) charrette to develop strategies to deal with the immediate threats to communities during extreme heat events, as well as devise design solutions to mitigate the impact of the rising temperatures predicted by 2070. If you decide to hold your own charette, be sure to check out Next City's list of 5 Ways Planners Get Charrettes Wrong to avoid some common pitfalls!

An implementation map for projects proposed during a Living With Heat charrette in Boston

Better Block transformed and activated the banks of a creek in Richardson, Texas, while community volunteers in Houston transformed a vacant lot into a chess park to convince the city to invest in pocket parks to bridge the parks equity gap. Houston's SPARK Parks initiative is also addressing parks equity through school-based parks.

The following video tells the story behind the MLK Food Park in South Dallas where Better Block worked with the community to turn a vacant lot into a park:

Transforming vacant or underutilized space into accessible greenspace can also have a number secondary benefits for the surrounding community, like improved mental health and decreased crime. In 2021, Harris County, Texas, launched an initiative to invest in planting trees, adding streetlights and sidewalks, and cleaning up vacant lots to reduce the dramatic rise in violent crime through environmental design.

There are a number of free guides and resources available to help guide efforts to advance greenspace equity:

Monitoring, Evaluation, Maintenance, and Stewardship

In Tactical Urbanism Toolkit: A guide to demonstration and interim projects focused on active transportation and placemaking, (Urban Systems, 2020), the authors recommend a variety of strategies for ongoing monitoring of a tactical urbanism project.

Monitor

Monitoring through data collection and observation illuminates the impacts of the project while assessing its suitability for long-term implementation and scaling. Both quantitative and qualitative data can be collected to monitor how the space is being used, or how (and by whom) it's not being used. Data collection methods include the following:

  • User counts: can be conducted manually using trained staff or volunteers, or automatic count technology can be utilized. Automatic data collection technology includes infrared devices, video, piezoelectric strips, or pneumatic tubes. App-based GPS data may also be acquired, either from publicly available sources such as Strava or by purchasing anonymized cell phone data from Big Data providers.
  • User feedback: collected by user surveys, either in person or online. Intercept surveys can be conducted, or a designated booth can be set up on site to provide information about the project and elicit feedback. In addition to surveys, testimonials can be gathered to gain more personal and detailed user feedback related to the project. The type of input collected will vary depending on the type and purpose of the project. When collecting feedback, apply an equity lens and strive to accommodate those who may not have access to a mobile device or the internet, people who speak another language, and other people with a disability or other impediment impacting their ability to provide feedback.
  • Observations: One or more members of the project team should gather observations, including notes, photos, and videos of the project and users. For longer projects, observation and photos should be taken at different times, days, and in different conditions to gain a full appreciation for how the new space functions.

Evaluate

Analyze the collected data and watch for overall functionality, including traffic flow, multi-modal access, and maintenance concerns. Identify who is using the space and assess whether or not they are representative of the community. Are there any groups being left out? Is the space functioning how it was intended to function? Compare these observations to your baseline results to evaluate the effectiveness of the project in achieving the stated purpose and goals.

Adjust

Based on the quantitative and qualitative data and observations, make adjustments to the project as needed. Making adjustments shows responsiveness and flexibility, and it can help to quickly alleviate concerns that pop up during the project. This is iterative process – continually evaluate the adjustments and make further changes as needed. All adjustments should be made with the original permit and safety considerations in mind – major alterations would require additional discussion with municipal staff.

Maintenance and Stewardship

Ensure that the project site remains well maintained throughout the project lifespan. This includes regular maintenance such as street sweeping, snow removal, and waste collection, in addition to projectspecific maintenance, such as moved traffic cones, replacing damaged materials, etc. Project stewardship can involve the municipality as well as community groups or other organizations, as outlined in Phase 1. Coordinate with municipal public works departments for any custom maintenance requirements, such as temporarily moving materials out of the way to enable street sweeping or snow removal.

Appendix

Books & Manuals

The following books and manuals provide step-by-step guidance on how to plan, implement, and evaluate tactical urbanism and placemaking interventions.

Videos

The following videos provide additional rationale for tactical urbanism and real-world case studies of tactical urbanism and placemaking projects around the world.

Tactical Urbanism: An introduction

How can tactical urbanism help create healthier streets?

Tactical Urbanists transform streets overnight

How to build a better block

Transform Your City With Tactical Urbanism

Tactical Urbanism: Project Delivery for a Post Pandemic World

Websites

The following websites provide resources and information on tactical urbanism.

  • Tactical Urbanism Interventionist's Toolkit: emerging practices of provisional, opportunistic, ubiquitous, and odd tactics in guerrilla and DIY practice and urbanism.
  • Project for Public Spaces: The Project for Public Spaces has conducted numerous tactical urbanism projects since 1975. Since that time they have developed an archive of case studies which can serve as inspiration for others.
  • Park(ing) Day: a global, public, participatory art project launched by Rebar in 2005. It is a day where people across the world temporarily repurpose street parking spaces and convert them to tiny parks and places for art, play, and activism.
  • Little Free Library: Little Free Library is a nonprofit organization based in Hudson, Wisconsin. Its mission is to be a catalyst for building community, inspiring readers, and expanding book access for all through a global network of volunteer-led Little Free Libraries.

User-Friendly Tools

The following user-friendly tools can be used to prioritize, map, plan, and evaluate tactical urbanism interventions.

  • Better Block Recipe Library: popular design elements that anyone can gather the supplies for and implement in their own neighborhood.
  • ArcGIS Online: Quickly create maps by dropping in your spreadsheet and mashing it up with other location data.
  • ArcGIS StoryMaps: everything you need to create remarkable stories that give your maps meaning.
  • EJScreen (EPA): Environmental Justice Screening and Mapping Tool.
  • Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool (CEQ): provides socioeconomic, environmental, health and climate information to identify disadvantaged communities that are marginalized, underserved, and overburdened by pollution and to inform decisions that may affect these communities.

Social Media

The following social media platforms can be used by organizations or individuals to plan, market, coordinate, and mobile support for tactical urbanism interventions and policy advocacy.

  • Facebook: largest global platform; interactive content such as polls and live streams; can be used to place ads; 51% adults, especially over age 40.
  • Instagram: popular platform for influencers and brands; stories feature; demographic data; 71% under age 35.
  • Snapchat: disappearing messages and videos; discover feature; map feature; 71% of 18-24 year olds.
  • Twitter: crowdsources important news and discussion threads; tweets get boosted by google search results; uses targetted keywords (hashtags) to reach larger audience; 63% between ages 35-65.
  • TikTok: create and send short videos, often with music and dancing/skits; trending, informal content; for you page/feed; mostly 16-24 year olds.
  • YouTube: video sharing platform; large reach, subscription feature; mostly 15-34 year olds.
  • LinkedIn: professional networking platform; targeted audience based on location and industry; 37% of adults are between the ages of 30-49 years old.

Community-Based Tactical Urbanism Organizations

The following community-based and community-oriented organizations provide resources and support for carrying out tactical urbanism projects.

  • Better Block (Dallas): a 501(c)3 nonprofit that educates, equips, and empowers communities and their leaders to reshape and reactivate built environments to promote the growth of healthy and vibrant neighborhoods.
  • Museum of Reclaimed Urban Space (NYC): preserves the history of the Lower East Side’s grassroots activism and promotes environmentally-sound, community-based urban ecologies.
  • The Street Plans Collaborative (Brooklyn): an urban planning, design, and advocacy firm.
  • NEO Project (Houston): NEO is dedicated to helping people of all ages and backgrounds lead more active outdoor-oriented lives for better health, happiness, and wellbeing. Convenes Healthy Outdor Communities, a groundbreaking outdoor initiative to promote health, wellbeing, and resilience in urban communities.

Contact Information

For more information or to reach out with any questions/concerns, feel free to contact Ed Pettitt at edpettitt@gmail.com.

Recommended Citations

Chicago: Pettitt, Edward. 2022. "Tactical Urbanism: A Participatory Planning & Action Toolkit for Environmental Justice Communities." Adobe Express. Last modified March 3, 2022. https://express.adobe.com/page/sGfRkQBieI9Xm/.

APA: Pettitt, E. (2022, March 3). Tactical Urbanism: A Participatory Planning & Action Toolkit for Environmental Justice Communities. Adobe Express. https://express.adobe.com/page/sGfRkQBieI9Xm/

MLA: Pettitt, Edward. "Tactical Urbanism: A Participatory Planning & Action Toolkit for Environmental Justice Communities." Adobe Express, 3 Mar. 2022, https://express.adobe.com/page/sGfRkQBieI9Xm/.

Credits:

Created with images by Wayne Lee-Sing - "I’ll Catch You!" • Markus Spiske - "WE ARE ON FIRE - ACT NOW! Global climate change strike - No Planet B - 09-20-2019" • CJ68 - "women people design" • Clay Banks - "We're better when we're united" • Christina @ wocintechchat.com - "untitled image" • Wokandapix - "equity diversity unity" • NOAA - "Calibrating geomagnetic instruments at the Coast and Geodetic Surveygeomagnetic observatory at Corbin, Virginia. " • Marvin Meyer - "untitled image" • Pexels - "concept man papers" • Photos Hobby - "Curve Next" • Julius Jansson - "Classic New York City street view: yellow cabs in Times Square. 📸 Julius Jansson See more at 👉www.juliusjansson.com 🙂 Please follow me also at 👉 www.instagram.com/julius.jansson/" • Firmbee - "ux design webdesign" • PintoArt - "mano de mujer con un boligrafo escribiendo" • Aneta Pawlik - "untitled image" • Kaufdex - "youtube media screen" • lukasbieri - "business man laptop work" • Firmbee - "ipad map tablet" • Pixelkult - "media social media apps"